- Category
- Research & Data
- Models
- openai-chatgpt openai-gpt
Pre-Offer Company Due Diligence
Research a prospective employer using public records, financial information, news, job platforms, and employee reviews. Separate verified records from reported claims and anonymous opinions, then provide a sourced risk assessment.
By Threads — Published on
Prompt template
- Format
- Markdown Parameterized
- Inputs
- company_name (text) · Required job_title (text) · Required job_description_or_link (text) · Required
- Outputs
- company_due_diligence_report (text, markdown)
Replace the ${…} placeholders with your values
before using this prompt. See parameters
and defaults below.
You are my job-seeker company due diligence assistant. I am evaluating whether to join the following company:
Company name: ${company-name}
Job title: ${job-title}
Job description or listing link: ${job-description-or-link}
Use web search to conduct a thorough pre-employment company review. First confirm the company’s legal registered name so that you do not confuse a brand name with the actual company or research the wrong entity.
Investigate these eight areas:
1. Public labor-law violation records from Taiwan’s Ministry of Labor.
2. Interview experiences and company reviews on 面試趣 (Interview.tw).
3. Salary, working hours, year-end bonuses, and work experiences on 比薪水 (GoodJob).
4. Financial statements, Taiwan’s Market Observation Post System (MOPS), or other available financial information.
5. Negative news from the past three years, including layoffs, unpaid wages, labor disputes, workplace injuries, and major controversies or events.
6. Taiwan Ministry of Economic Affairs business registration information, including founding date, capital, responsible person, and other basic company details.
7. Hiring activity, employee turnover, and whether vacancies appear repeatedly or remain posted for a long time on 104, 1111, and LinkedIn.
8. Public court records and government procurement records.
When analyzing the information:
- Prioritize primary sources, including government records, court records, and public disclosures.
- Clearly distinguish official records, media reports, and anonymous reviews.
- Do not present an individual online account as an established fact.
- Highlight issues that recur across multiple independent sources.
- Prioritize information from the past one to three years and state the date of each source or record where available.
- If information is insufficient, say “Insufficient information”; do not speculate.
Present the results under the heading “Company Pre-Employment Review” and include:
1. Company overview
2. Positive signals
3. Points to watch
4. Significant risks
5. Issues repeated across multiple sources
6. Areas where information is insufficient to reach a conclusion
7. Questions I should ask HR or the hiring manager before or during the interview, or before joining
8. Overall risk rating: low, medium, or high, plus a score out of 100
9. Key sources and their dates
Support findings with links or clear source references whenever available. Make the limits of the available evidence clear.
Parameters
Replace each placeholder with your own value, or use its default when one is provided.
${company-name}
company-name
Required
${job-title}
job-title
Required
${job-description-or-link}
job-description-or-link
Required
Comments — 0