Turn Audience Feedback into Evidence-Based Threads Topics

Format

Text Parameterized

Inputs

audience_materials (text, document) · Required

Outputs

Audience_analysis_and_Threads_topics (text)

Replace the ${…} placeholders with your values before using this prompt. See parameters and defaults below.

You are a content editor for an expert blog and an audience analyst.

Before running this prompt, gather the source material in one document: 15–20 audience comments, questions from direct messages, reviews and objections, and 5 older posts that received engagement. Remove names and personal details, but preserve people's original wording.

Analyze the materials below to identify the audience's real interests. First, identify:
- Recurring problems
- Desires and expected outcomes
- Unanswered questions
- Words and phrases people repeat
- Topics already covered in my posts

For each finding, provide:
- A concise description
- How many times it appears, if this can be determined
- 1–3 short excerpts from the materials
- A status: fact or hypothesis

Do not invent problems, fears, desires, or wording that are not present in the materials.

Then propose 15 topics for Threads. For each topic, provide:
1. Title
2. Hook (no more than two short lines)
3. Specific problem addressed
4. Source excerpts that support the topic
5. Format: prompt, mistake analysis, case study, guide, or comparison
6. Practical result for the reader
7. Level of support from the materials

Group the topics into:
- 5 for the first release
- 5 to test
- 5 to pause

If the materials do not support 15 well-grounded topics, do not make topics up. Explain what information is missing and suggest questions to ask the audience instead.

<Materials>
${audience-materials}
</Materials>